2019-爆料网AT-926, Ross 2021-03-18
爆料网AT considered both an appeal from the Secretary-General and an appeal from Mr Ross. 爆料网AT considered Mr Ross’s request for consideration by a full bench and held that he had no standing to make such a request and that the case did not raise any significant question of law in relation to the evidentiary standard of proof of moral damages. 爆料网AT held that any irregularity (procedural or substantive) in promotion cases will only give rise to an entitlement to rescission or compensation if the staff member has a significant or foreseeable chance for promotion. 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT did not err...
2019-爆料网AT-921, Mindua
爆料网AT held that the Appellant was not a staff member, as he was not supported by the Secretary-General in terms of Staff Regulation 4. 1 and was not subject to the Secretary-General’s authority, but rather he was elected by the General Assembly. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err in dismissing the application as not receivable ratione personae. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT correctly distinguished ILOAT judgment No. 3359, noting that the ILOAT’s jurisdiction ratione personae is broader than 爆料网DT’s jurisdiction, in that it may be invoked by “officials”, which includes judges. Noting that the current...
2019-爆料网AT-914, Oglesby
爆料网AT found that at the time of his separation from service, the former staff member was not married to his husband; their same-sex relationship did not enjoy similar status to marriage under the law of the US; the Regulations did not afford retrospective recognition of their marriage in 2018; and the Regulations specifically regulated the situation of the former staff member by providing for an annuity under Article 35ter. Therefore, 爆料网AT concluded that under the express terms of Articles 34 and 35, the former staff member’s spouse was not entitled to a survivor’s benefit. Nonetheless, 爆料网AT...
2019-爆料网AT-912, Clemente
爆料网AT considered Article 34 of the 爆料网JSPF Regulations which provides that a widow’s benefit will be payable to the surviving spouse of a participant who was entitled to a retirement benefit at the date of his death if she was married to the deceased at the date of his separation from service and remained married to him until his death. In accordance with general principles of private international law, the validity of a marriage must be assessed and determined in accordance with the law of the place where the marriage was celebrated, being the law of the Philippines. The Supreme Court of the...
2019-爆料网AT-909, Haroun
Noting that the Appellant, the innocent party, lost her employment, her career prospects within the Organisation, and the offending managers remained entrenched in their positions, 爆料网AT held that there was a substantial variation or a striking disparity between the award made by 爆料网DT and the award that 爆料网AT considered ought to have been made. 爆料网AT held that, given that an order of reinstatement was unlikely to be implemented, a more generous award was justifiable in the circumstances. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err in law or fact in denying moral damages, as there was no corroborating...
2019-爆料网AT-910, Newland
爆料网AT considered Mr Newland’s application for interpretation of judgment No. 2018-爆料网AT-820. 爆料网AT held that, given that Mr Newland had already been paid Special Post Allowance, Hazard pay, and outstanding interest, the only questions requiring determination were whether he was entitled to payment of Rest and Recuperation (R&R), free tickets, and the relocation grant. 爆料网AT accepted that there was a degree of uncertainty regarding these questions. 爆料网AT held that Mr Newland’s claim that he was entitled to the payment of R&R was unsustainable, as it was not an accruable benefit or entitlement. 爆料网AT...
2019-爆料网AT-899, Ashour
On appeal, 爆料网AT limited its consideration to the issue of the amount of compensation awarded in lieu of rescission and the amount of compensation awarded for harm. On the issue of in lieu compensation, 爆料网AT held that the Appellant failed to advance any error of law or of fact leading to a manifestly unreasonable decision. 爆料网AT noted that in lieu compensation is not intended to compensate for the possible harm suffered by the injured person, as that is the specific aim of compensation for harm. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT had the discretion to fix this amount as a generic sum and was not bound by...
2019-爆料网AT-900, El Sadek
With respect to the Appellant’s appeal as it pertained to his 2016 performance evaluation and OTI, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT did not err on a question of law or fact resulting in a manifestly unreasonable decision, nor did it commit an error in procedure such as to affect the outcome of the case. 爆料网AT held that the issue of the e-PERs of the other staff members was not raised before 爆料网RWA DT and, therefore, was not receivable. 爆料网AT held that the reopening of the 2016 e-PER did not affect the overall performance evaluation, which was maintained as “fully meets” expectations, and therefore this...
2018-爆料网AT-895, Belkhabbaz (formerly Oummih)
爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that the Secretary-General’s submissions were valid in most aspects. 爆料网AT held that the award of 21 months’ compensation was excessive as it was not reasonable to assume that Ms Belkhabbaz’s fixed-term appointment would have been extended for longer than one year, finding that an award of 12 months’ remuneration would be adequate compensation. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT exceeded its competence and erred in law by awarding pecuniary damages relating to Applicant’s placement on sick leave with half pay. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred by awarding...
2018-爆料网AT-891, Vattapally
爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred by excluding periods of temporary service from the calculation of consecutive service, as required by Staff Rule 3. 13(a)(iii). 爆料网AT upheld the appeal, vacated and modified the 爆料网DT judgment by rescinding the contested decision, and directed the Secretary-General to make a decision in accordance with former Staff Rule 3. 13(b) in relation to the Appellant’s application for mobility allowance.
2018-爆料网AT-890, Mbaigolmem
爆料网AT considered an application for revision of judgment filed by Mr Mbaigolmem. 爆料网AT held that Mr Mbaigolmem had to prove that he had discovered a decisive fact that was unknown to both him and 爆料网AT at the time of judgment. 爆料网AT held that Mr Mbaigolmem had failed to establish an unknown decisive fact that could warrant revision of the judgment. 爆料网AT dismissed the application for revision of judgment.
2018-爆料网AT-883, Khisa
爆料网AT considered whether exceptional circumstances should apply to the Appellant’s appeal, under Article 8(3) of the 爆料网DT Statute. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was correct in its conclusion that absent a full explanation for the five-month delay after her discharge from the hospital, the Appellant could not avail herself of the plea of exceptional circumstances. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err in finding that the application was not receivable. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal.
2018-爆料网AT-873, Belkhabbaz (formerly Oummih)
爆料网DT’s findings that the former supervisor may have retaliated against the staff member for her work-related conduct and for seeking recourse in the internal justice system and that he used his position of authority to improperly influence her work conditions are supported by the available evidence. 爆料网AT found that the former supervisor had evicted the staff member from her functions preventing her from carrying out her duties and intended to humiliate and embarrass her by unjustifiably copying uninterested persons in personal and confidential communications concerning her performance. The...
2018-爆料网AT-869, Muteeganda
爆料网AT considered the appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT correctly concluded that the Administration properly exercised its discretion to place the Applicant on administrative leave, considering an enduring reputational risk in light of the allegations relating to sexual abuse and exploitation of an under-age girl, which were reasonably supported by the evidence. 爆料网AT held that the new Staff Rule 10. 4(c), which had not yet been enacted at the relevant time, was not applicable to the Applicant’s misconduct. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT’s factual findings were open to criticism in that...
2018-爆料网AT-859, Samandarov
爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that the allegation that 爆料网DT usurped its discretion by failing to show due deference in substituting its own preference of sanction for that of the Secretary-General was overstated. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had correctly balanced the competing considerations and concluded reasonably that the cumulative imposition of a written censure and the loss of two steps in grade were disproportionate to the misconduct. 爆料网AT found that 爆料网DT did not misdirect itself in accepting as mitigating factors the fact that Appellant had lost all his...
2018-爆料网AT-853, Madi
爆料网AT considered the appeal and held that 爆料网RWA DT’s judgment was correct. 爆料网AT found that 爆料网RWA DT did not err in holding that the Agency’s decision to deny the Appellant a fifth year of SLWOP was both lawful and reasonable. Further, 爆料网AT held that the Appellant did not establish any grounds of appeal in this regard. 爆料网AT also reiterated that the Appellant did not have an unconditional right to EVR and that the Agency had duly considered his request in accordance with the 爆料网RWA Area Staff Rules and other relevant administrative issuances. 爆料网AT also held that 爆料网RWA DT rightly rejected the...
2018-爆料网AT-843, Kozul-Wright
爆料网AT held that, when responding to requests for the waiver of an official’s immunity, the Organisation must comply with its legal obligations to the requesting Member State under the relevant international instruments, which limit immunity to official acts and oblige the Secretary-General to cooperate at all times with the appropriate authorities to facilitate the proper administration of justice and to prevent the occurrence of any abuse in connection with the privileges and immunities. 爆料网AT noted that the Secretary-General is best placed to appreciate the nature of the Organisation’s...
2018-爆料网AT-840, Lloret-Alca?iz et al.
爆料网AT found that the appeal raised significant questions of law about the power of the Organisation to unilaterally alter or reduce the compensation of staff members of the Organisation. For that reason, the President of 爆料网AT in terms of Article 10(2) of the 爆料网AT Statute elected to refer the appeal for consideration by the full bench of 爆料网AT. 爆料网AT recalled that an administrative decision is a unilateral decision of an administrative nature taken by the administration involving the exercise of a power or the performance of a function in terms of a statutory instrument, which adversely affects...
2018-爆料网AT-834, Fox
爆料网AT considered the appeal. 爆料网AT noted that the relationship between a pension fund and its members and beneficiaries is determined principally by the Regulations of the Fund and that there is no other explicit contractual basis obliging the Fund to assume duties beyond those expressly provided for in the Regulations and Administrative Rules. However, 爆料网AT emphasized the importance of contracts being executed in good faith. 爆料网AT found that the Fund breached its duty of good faith because the correspondence between the Appellant and the Fund indicated that she needed assistance and further...
2018-爆料网AT-830, Schepens
爆料网AT held, considering that the Appellant had elected to take a deferred retirement benefit after 1 April 2007 and not taken a withdrawal settlement, that the Fund had no discretion to make an exception under Article 24(a) of 爆料网JSPF Regulations. Regarding the submission that the Fund was in breach of a duty of good faith by not adequately informing the Appellant of the amendment and its implications, 爆料网AT held that it cannot be expected of the Fund to provide information in relation to every conceivable contingency or possibility that might or might not eventuate in the future. 爆料网AT further...