爆料网

New York

Showing 721 - 730 of 2504
2011-爆料网AT-168, Yapa

爆料网AT considered appeals by both the Secretary-General and Mr Yapa. On the issue of the two-year ban on promotion, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not commit an error of law in considering that the general legal principle that a sanction may not be imposed on any person unless expressly provided for by a rule in force on the date of the facts held against that person must be respected in disciplinary matters. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err on a question of law in finding that the sanction of a two-year ban on promotion lacked a legal basis. On the written censure and demotion, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did...

2011-爆料网AT-170, Kapsou

爆料网AT held that the Appellant had failed to seek administrative review of the contested decision before launching an appeal with the Joint Appeals Board (JAB). 爆料网AT held that those steps had to have been exhausted before invoking the jurisdiction of 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in considering that the decision of 10 October 2008 was merely a confirmation of an earlier decision. 爆料网AT held that the decision of 10 October 2008 was a new administrative decision for which the Applicant did not seek administrative review. 爆料网AT noted that 爆料网DT has no jurisdiction to waive the requirement of a prior...

2011-爆料网AT-158, Laeijendecker

爆料网AT took into account that the Appellant only made his request some 29 months after the expiration of the deadline and that he did not submit any medical report. 爆料网AT held that the appeal was not receivable. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and upheld the 爆料网JSPB decision.

2011-爆料网AT-155, Ansa-Emmim

爆料网AT held that the record reflected that: Michael and Jacqueline married in 1986; they had lived as husband and wife, and Jacqueline was Michael’s wife on the date of his separation from service in 1998 and on the date of his death in 2008. 爆料网AT held that Michael’s first wife was unable to produce a marriage certificate and the divorce decree she produced was not proof of marriage, despite the date of marriage having been mentioned therein. 爆料网AT held that the divorce decree could not be the sole basis of declaring Jacqueline’s marriage to Michael invalid. 爆料网AT held that Jacqueline was entitled...

2011-爆料网AT-156, Taylor

爆料网AT held that the Appellant was essentially seeking an amendment to the Regulations of the 爆料网JPSF in such a way as to enable her benefit to be paid retroactively to the date of the death in service of her husband, which was prior to 1 April 1999. 爆料网AT held that the criteria proposed by the Appellant to pay the benefit were not in force to be applied to her case. 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网JSPF correctly applied the 爆料网JSPF Regulations. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the impugned decision.

2011-爆料网AT-157, Onana

爆料网AT held that the appeal was not receivable because it was not filed within the deadline. 爆料网AT held that there were no exceptional circumstances for it to waive the time limits. 爆料网AT was not persuaded that the Appellant did not receive the 爆料网DT judgment or any notification of the judgment, as he had actual knowledge of the judgment. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s right to due process of law was not violated. 爆料网AT held that the appeal was not receivable as it was time-barred. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.

2011-爆料网AT-152, Ishak

爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT correctly held that the Appellant’s case was not receivable. 爆料网AT held that a selection process involved a series of steps or findings which led to the administrative decision, and that these steps may only be challenged in the context of an appeal against the outcome of the selection process, but cannot alone be the subject of an appeal to the 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT’s decision to order the Appellant to pay the sum of CHF 2,000, was justified because he filed a frivolous application and made all kinds of baseless charges against the fairness of the 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT...