爆料网

Termination (of appointment)

  • Abolition of position
  • Agreed termination
  • Disciplinary sanction
  • Health reasons
  • Raisons de santé
  • Standard of proof
  • Summary dismissal
  • Unsatisfactory service
    • Showing 101 - 110 of 303
    2014-爆料网AT-450, Bali

    爆料网AT considered the Secretary-General’s appeal and noted that the Secretary-General has broad discretion in matters of staff selection. 爆料网AT found that the extensive correspondence between Mr Bali and management indicated that he was aware that his candidature would be considered along with all other applicants, and that his name was placed on a roster of pre-approved candidates for potential consideration for future job openings with similar functions at the Secretariat. 爆料网AT also noted that Mr Bali was encouraged by the Office of Human Resources Management’s (OHRM) advocacy and information...

    2014-爆料网AT-442, El-Khalek

    爆料网RWA DT considered an appeal by the Commissioner-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT did not err in fact or in law such as to vitiate its judgment, except with regards to the award of compensation. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT did not overstep its role to judicially review the administrative decision imposing a disciplinary measure on the staff member and terminating his appointment. 爆料网AT held that the Administration had failed to demonstrate that the staff member had committed the serious misconduct he had been charged with, because not only did the proceedings fail to provide him with an adequate...

    2014-爆料网AT-433, Hersh

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had correctly stated that even if it could be argued that the profile of the Broadcast Technology Officer (BTO P-4) post had changed due to the drafting of new Terms of Reference (TOR) by Ms Hermann, the only viable course of action in the circumstances for the purposes of filling it would have been a regular, competitive selection process and not a comparative review as happened in this case. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was correct in finding that the so-called comparative review between Ms Hersh and Mr Tobgyal for the only post...

    2014-爆料网AT-436, Walden

    爆料网AT considered appeals by both the staff member and the Commissioner-General. 爆料网AT held that the fact was undisputed that the staff member knowingly presented non-existent credentials despite questioning the ethics of accepting the document with his qualifications. 爆料网AT held that termination was not disproportionate to the offence, taking into account that the staff member’s recruitment, in the first instance, was predicated on the existence of a degree subsequently established to be without merit and which never would have qualified him for selection by the Organisation. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA...

    2014-爆料网AT-421, Das

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that, at the time 爆料网ICEF sought to make the correction from termination to non-renewal, the staff member was already separated from service, and it was, therefore, too late to reverse the decision. 爆料网AT affirmed 爆料网DT’s finding that the staff member’s separation from service was termination on grounds of alleged unsatisfactory performance and that the Administration’s decision to reverse the decision was untimely and ineffective. 爆料网AT held that there was no reason to reverse 爆料网DT’s finding that the staff member had been deprived of a...

    2014-爆料网AT-403, Diabagate

    爆料网AT noted that V01 had not been placed under oath before giving her interview and that she did not sign the transcribed version of her interview statement. 爆料网AT held that V01’s transcribed statement, in which she said that the Appellant had raped her and engaged in sex with her, was neither reliable nor trustworthy; it was solely hearsay and insufficient, by itself, to prove the charge that the Appellant engaged in sexual activity with a minor. 爆料网AT held that similarly the other written documents were replete with hearsay and multiple hearsays and were neither trustworthy nor sufficient to...

    2015-爆料网AT-602, Zamel

    爆料网AT held that the allegations of irregularity raised by the Appellant were supported by evidence. 爆料网AT noted that it was hard to comprehend how the Appellant’s post suddenly became redundant when at the same time around 75 per cent of its functions were to be transferred to a consultant. 爆料网AT further noted that even though the new organisational structure was not approved until September 2013, as early as June 2013, the abolition of the Appellant’s post had already been decided and was communicated to him by his supervisor, against whom the Appellant filed a complaint of abuse of power. 爆料网AT...

    2015-爆料网AT-592, Matadi et al

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT accepted the Secretary-General’s position that 爆料网MIL staff members were given the opportunity to comment on the proposed restructuring from the beginning of the process, and the 爆料网MIL National Staff Association representative participated in the discussion on the Guidelines for the comparative review process. 爆料网AT held that it would not speculate on the chances that each of the posts might not have been abolished if there had been consultations with the National Staff Association. 爆料网AT held that the change in the composition of the...

    2015-爆料网AT-587, Faraj

    爆料网AT had before it an appeal by the staff member limited to the award of compensation. 爆料网AT noted that 爆料网RWA DT set the compensation in lieu of reinstatement award by calculating the sum the Appellant would have received for the remainder of his two-year contract, less the amount he received as salaries from other employers during the same period. 爆料网AT held that there was no error in this regard. 爆料网AT held that it was satisfied that in its assessment of compensation in lieu of reinstatement, 爆料网RWA DT was conscious of the Appellant’s claims for loss of opportunity. 爆料网AT held that, in view of...

    2015-爆料网AT-583, Lee

    On the Appellant’s claim that 爆料网DT erred in failing to hold an oral hearing, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was in possession of the respective applications and documentation which it considered to be sufficient to make the relevant decisions to facilitate the fair and expeditious disposal of the case. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT correctly found that the Appellant did not contest an administrative decision and therefore, there was no legal basis to support the contention that she had a right to be informed of the identity of the decision-makers, noting that she had been informed on several occasions that it was...