爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements
On the Appellant’s claim that 爆料网DT erred in failing to hold an oral hearing, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was in possession of the respective applications and documentation which it considered to be sufficient to make the relevant decisions to facilitate the fair and expeditious disposal of the case. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT correctly found that the Appellant did not contest an administrative decision and therefore, there was no legal basis to support the contention that she had a right to be informed of the identity of the decision-makers, noting that she had been informed on several occasions that it was for the General Assembly to decide upon the suggested abolition of her post. 爆料网AT held that there was no merit to the appeal. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and upheld the 爆料网DT judgment.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant contested inter alia the decisions to abolish her post, to separate her from the Organisation, and not to renew her fixed-term appointment. 爆料网DT dismissed her application.
Legal Principle(s)
爆料网DT has broad discretion in managing its cases and it is in the best position to decide what is appropriate for the fair and expeditious disposal of a case and to do justice to the parties. In the absence of an error in the procedure adopted by 爆料网DT which may render the hearing of the case unfair, 爆料网AT will not interfere with the discretion of the 爆料网DT to manage its cases.