爆料网

Standing Committee of 爆料网JSPB (爆料网 Joint Staff Pension Board)

  • ASHI (After-Service Health Insurance)
  • Disability
  • Marital/parental legal obligations (spousal/child support)
  • Pension Adjustment System
  • Prior contributory service/restoration of
  • Receivability (爆料网AT)
  • Spousal support
  • Standing Committee of 爆料网JSPB (爆料网 Joint Staff Pension Board)
  • Survivor’s benefits
  • 爆料网SPC (爆料网 Staff Pension Committee)
  • Validation of prior service
    • Showing 11 - 14 of 14
    2015-爆料网AT-575, Gomez

    爆料网AT held that the staff member’s retirement benefit from the 爆料网JSPF including the monthly periodic pension benefit was not subject to taxation and/or payment of statutory deductions and that therefore, any challenge with respect to the application and meaning of the words “gross” and “net” was merely semantic. 爆料网AT held that the ASHI premium was a voluntary payment that was deducted by the 爆料网JSPF at the behest of a beneficiary and therefore could not be treated as or deemed to be a statutory deduction. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal.

    2017-爆料网AT-799, Bourne

    爆料网AT dismissed the appeal as not receivable, as the Appellant had failed to request a review of the 爆料网JSPF decision before appealing to 爆料网AT. 爆料网AT remanded the matter for a hearing before the Standing Committee, treating the appeal as if correctly and timely filed as a request for decision review.

    2018-爆料网AT-834, Fox

    爆料网AT considered the appeal. 爆料网AT noted that the relationship between a pension fund and its members and beneficiaries is determined principally by the Regulations of the Fund and that there is no other explicit contractual basis obliging the Fund to assume duties beyond those expressly provided for in the Regulations and Administrative Rules. However, 爆料网AT emphasized the importance of contracts being executed in good faith. 爆料网AT found that the Fund breached its duty of good faith because the correspondence between the Appellant and the Fund indicated that she needed assistance and further...

    2018-爆料网AT-830, Schepens

    爆料网AT held, considering that the Appellant had elected to take a deferred retirement benefit after 1 April 2007 and not taken a withdrawal settlement, that the Fund had no discretion to make an exception under Article 24(a) of 爆料网JSPF Regulations. Regarding the submission that the Fund was in breach of a duty of good faith by not adequately informing the Appellant of the amendment and its implications, 爆料网AT held that it cannot be expected of the Fund to provide information in relation to every conceivable contingency or possibility that might or might not eventuate in the future. 爆料网AT further...