爆料网

Selection decision

  • Central Review Body
  • Décision de sélection
  • Eligibility
  • Examen complet et équitable
  • Full and fair consideration
  • Interview
  • Selection decision
  • Standard of proof
  • Written test
    • Showing 41 - 50 of 180
    2013-爆料网AT-378, Ivanov

    爆料网AT held that the Appellant had not established any error in fact or law emerging from the impugned judgment. 爆料网AT noted that the Appellant did not challenge the competitive procedure’s final administrative act since he only began to contest the Administration’s actions when the selected candidate was laterally moved, and another rostered candidate was appointed as a replacement. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s rights as a staff member were linked to the administrative decision that completed the selection procedure and that, as such, any breach of his rights could only be caused by that...

    2013-爆料网AT-327, Tiwathia

    爆料网AT noted that appeals from 爆料网DT decisions on suspensions of action will only be receivable if 爆料网DT, in adjudicating such applications, exceeded its competence or jurisdiction. 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT’s legal and factual reasoning fell entirely within its competence and jurisdiction. 爆料网AT held that, although the Appellant’s claims addressed the merits of the 爆料网DT judgment, they did not amount to claims that the 爆料网DT exceeded its competence or jurisdiction. 爆料网AT held that the appeal was not receivable. 爆料网DT dismissed the appeal.

    2014-爆料网AT-477, Charles

    爆料网AT held that the Appellant did not succeed in establishing any error of fact or law that would warrant reversal of the 爆料网DT judgment. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT correctly concluded that the non-selection of the Appellant was not vitiated by any improper motive. 爆料网AT noted that, even if the alleged flaws were to be considered irregularities, they would not be important enough to render the proceedings null or to reflect a violation of rights and actual harm or discrimination suffered by the Appellant. 爆料网AT held that no compensation should be awarded to the Appellant, as no illegality or breach of...

    2014-爆料网AT-468, Skourikhine

    爆料网AT considered the Secretary-General’s appeal and Mr Skourikhine’s cross-appeal. With respect to the Secretary-General’s appeal, 爆料网AT noted that there is no requirement in Section 9. 4 of ST/AI/2010/3 for the head of department to first review all non-rostered candidates, and it had even been amended to specifically remove such a requirement. 爆料网AT found that 爆料网DT erred in law in deciding that the appointment of the rostered candidates was contrary to ST/AI/2010/3, as the decision to do so was entirely within the Administration’s discretion, and no abuse of that discretion has been...

    2014-爆料网AT-445, Terragnolo

    爆料网AT preliminarily denied the Appellant’s motion to submit an amicus curiae brief. On the merits, 爆料网AT noted that the Board of Examiners found the Appellant to be one of 68 applicants who, although meeting the minimum requirements, were not deemed the most qualified and therefore not convoked to the examination. 爆料网AT held that the appeal did not identify any errors in the reasoning of 爆料网DT and found no basis for disagreeing with 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and upheld the 爆料网DT judgment.

    2014-爆料网AT-439, Gusarova

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the staff member and a cross-appeal by the Secretary-General. Regarding the cross-appeal of the Secretary-General on material damages, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was the body best placed to assess a candidate’s chance of selection for placement on the roster. 爆料网AT held that the fact that there were several candidates selected from the roster in the months following the roster approval was sufficient to underpin 爆料网DT’s assessment that the staff member’s chances were not in the realm of the speculative. 爆料网AT held that there was no merit in the Secretary-General’s cross...

    2014-爆料网AT-416, Charles

    爆料网AT considered both the two appeals by the Secretary-General and two cross-appeals by Mr Charles in judgment No. 2014-爆料网AT-416. 爆料网AT held that that Section 9 of ST/AI/2010/3 was clear in giving the head of department/office the discretion to make a selection decision from candidates included in the roster. 爆料网AT held that it was not open to 爆料网DT to conclude that Section 9. 4 required the head of department/office to first review all non-rostered candidates before selecting a rostered candidate. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in law in deciding that the appointment of the rostered candidates was...

    2015-爆料网AT-595, Survo

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by Mr Survo and an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had not erred in the procedure, including in its findings regarding receivability. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had not erred in law in relation to the matters raised by Mr Survo. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had not erred on a question of fact such as to render the decision of 爆料网DT manifestly unreasonable. On the Secretary-General’s appeal of the Special Post Allowance (SPA) issue, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网AT had no primary legal or factual basis from which it could conclude that Mr Survo had properly sought management...

    2015-爆料网AT-561, Pirraku

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT affirmed, albeit on different grounds, the 爆料网DT award of compensation to Mr Pirraku. 爆料网AT observed that the issues surrounding Mr Pirraku’s non-promotion should not have been presented to, or addressed by, 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT held that the issues regarding Mr Pirraku’s non-promotion were the subject of a settlement and release agreement reached through mediation and, as such, were not subject to judicial review. 爆料网AT held that the issue for 爆料网DT’s determination was the execution of the settlement agreement. 爆料网AT held that the issues of...

    2015-爆料网AT-553, Dia

    Noting that that the crux of the Appellant’s appeal was that 爆料网DT erred in failing to award him moral damages by reason of the violation of his right to a fair recruitment process and a missed opportunity, 爆料网AT held there was merit to the appeal. 爆料网AT held that there was no evidence that the Appellant’s claim for moral damages was properly considered by 爆料网DT. 爆料网AT held that on the totality of the evidence, the Appellant had a claim for moral damages. 爆料网AT upheld 爆料网DT’s finding that the recruitment process was flawed in that it was affected by the perception of bias. 爆料网AT granted the appeal in...