2012-爆料网AT-233, Charles
爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had correctly found that the determination made by the Programme OiC, namely that the application for sabbatical leave should not be forwarded to the Committee, was not within the Programme OiC’s power. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had correctly concluded that the decision made by the Programme OiC was in breach of the Appellant’s terms of employment “specifically, his right to have his application forwarded to the Committee and the [Assistant Secretary-General], OHRM”. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had properly observed that an “incomplete application may therefore be one which is missing...