爆料网

Performance evaluation

  • Performance evaluation
  • Rebuttal
    • Showing 21 - 30 of 93
    2015-爆料网AT-546, Staedtler

    爆料网AT held that the Appellant did not establish any procedural errors warranting the reversal of the judgment. 爆料网AT held that there was no evidence of any adverse administrative decision that stemmed from the Appellant’s performance appraisal and that the comments of his Second Reporting Officer (SRO) reflected no more than a legitimate exercise of administrative hierarchy evaluating employees, and did not of itself constitute an independent, administrative decision capable of being appealed. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT correctly concluded that the Appellant’s challenge which related to the comments of...

    2015-爆料网AT-534, Assale

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT made an error of law when it applied 爆料网ICEF Administrative Instruction CF/AI/2011-001 retroactively to review the non-renewal decision. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in law in concluding that it was the duty of the Administration to take measures to remedy failings in performance. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT’s conclusion that the non-renewal decision was vitiated by 爆料网ICEF’s failure to take remedial measures to improve Mr Assale’s performance was without legal basis. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erroneously concluded that both the Chad Country...

    2015-爆料网AT-516, Fiala

    爆料网AT considered two appeals by the Secretary-General against Order No. 136 (NBI/2010) and judgment No. 爆料网DT/2014/007. 爆料网AT held that it was not satisfied that the actions of the Secretary-General in filing two appeals amounted to an abuse of process and declined Ms Fiala’s application for an award of costs against the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that there was no error of law or fact on the part of 爆料网DT in deeming Ms Fiala’s application receivable. Noting that the weight to be attributed to evidence was a matter for 爆料网DT, 爆料网AT held that the arguments advanced by the Secretary-General did not...

    2017-爆料网AT-788, Soliman

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT did not err in law and/or fact resulting in a manifestly unreasonable decision when it found that 爆料网RWA’s decision not to renew the Appellant’s fixed-term appointment at the end of the probationary period was a lawful exercise of its discretion. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT correctly found that a performance-related justification for the non-renewal was properly given in the form of his electronic Performance Evaluation Report. 爆料网AT held that the irregularities in the assessment of the Appellant’s performance were not sufficiently substantial or consequential so as to rebut...

    2017-爆料网AT-721, Ncube

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in finding that the Administration had failed to provide a performance-related justification for its decision not to renew Mr Ncube’s fixed-term appointment. 爆料网AT held that the decision not to renew Mr Ncube’s appointment had to be upheld despite the fact that his e-PAS suffered from procedural irregularities as it did not consider that the flaws rendered the appraisal unlawful or unreasonable. 爆料网AT considered that the decision not to renew the appointment was justified because the Secretary-General proved that the...

    2017-爆料网AT-757, Sarwar

    爆料网AT held that the 爆料网DT’s determination that the decision to terminate the appointment was unlawful on account of the repeated non-compliance with ST/AI/2010/5 was formalistic. While obviously a work plan should be finalized at the beginning of a cycle, 爆料网DT held that there was nothing in ST/AI/2010/5 that held any failure to generate a work plan at the commencement of a cycle to be a procedural flaw resulting axiomatically in any subsequent decision to terminate an appointment being unlawful. Likewise, there is no such consequence for not holding a midpoint review in a timely manner. 爆料网AT...

    2018-爆料网AT-895, Belkhabbaz (formerly Oummih)

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that the Secretary-General’s submissions were valid in most aspects. 爆料网AT held that the award of 21 months’ compensation was excessive as it was not reasonable to assume that Ms Belkhabbaz’s fixed-term appointment would have been extended for longer than one year, finding that an award of 12 months’ remuneration would be adequate compensation. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT exceeded its competence and erred in law by awarding pecuniary damages relating to Applicant’s placement on sick leave with half pay. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred by awarding...

    2018-爆料网AT-868, Sarwar

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in reopening a matter that had already been the subject of a final judgment of 爆料网AT. 爆料网AT considered that 爆料网DT exceeded its competence and erred in law by making its own determination of Mr Sarwar’s harassment complaint, emphasising that the role of the Tribunal is not to substitute its own decision for that of the Administration. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred when it rescinded the contested decision to close the matter underlying the Appellant’s formal complaint, and when it ruled that there was no need for a new...

    2018-爆料网AT-838, Al-Ashi

    爆料网AT considered the appeal of the consolidated applications. With respect to the first issue, 爆料网AT found no error in 爆料网RWA DT’s conclusion that the Appellant had failed to establish that the decision not to confirm his appointment as TDSE Advisor and to transfer him to his previous post was unlawful. 爆料网AT noted that there was no merit in the Appellant’s contention that 爆料网RWA DT failed to examine the relevant facts and to apply legal and regulatory provisions to his performance evaluations during his probationary period. 爆料网DT also noted that the review of the Appellant’s performance assessments...

    2019-爆料网AT-951, Allen

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err that, in the circumstances of the complaints made and the importance of the Appellant’s role in a difficult duty station, the Respondent was entitled to place the Appellant on Special Leave with Pay while it investigated the allegations against him. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT ought not to have relied upon Morsy (judgment No. 2013-爆料网AT-298), Assale (judgment No. 2015-爆料网AT-534), and Sarwar (judgment No. 2017-爆料网AT-757) as it did. 爆料网AT noted that in the Appellant’s case, not only was there a performance-related justification required to be established but no proper...