±¬ÁÏÍø

On the Appellant¡¯s claim for his name not to appear in the ±¬ÁÏÍøAT judgment, ±¬ÁÏÍøAT held that, due to the fact that his name had been in the public domain for a long time as a result of the publication of many court documents related to his cases before ±¬ÁÏÍøDT and ±¬ÁÏÍøAT, it would be pointless to order redaction. ±¬ÁÏÍøAT held that the Appellant failed to give any compelling reason as to why confidentiality should be granted and denied his request for confidentiality. ±¬ÁÏÍøAT held that ±¬ÁÏÍøDT fully and fairly considered the merits of his case and was in no doubt as to its substance. ±¬ÁÏÍøAT held that there was no...

The Appellant appealed judgment Nos. ±¬ÁÏÍøDT/2016/113 (±¬ÁÏÍøAT Case No. 2016-972) and ±¬ÁÏÍøDT/2016/114 (±¬ÁÏÍøAT Case No. 2016-973). ±¬ÁÏÍøAT consolidated the two appeals. The Appellant submitted a motion to withdraw her appeals following the successful conclusion of mediation discussions and the signing of a settlement agreement. ±¬ÁÏÍøAT recalled its jurisprudence that there was no reason to require a party to pursue an appeal he or she no longer deems necessary in the context of his or her case. ±¬ÁÏÍøAT granted the motion to withdraw the Appellant¡¯s appeals and directed the Registrar to close both ±¬ÁÏÍøAT cases.

Ms Nielsen appealed judgment Nos. ±¬ÁÏÍøDT/2016/111 (±¬ÁÏÍøAT Case No. 2016-964) and ±¬ÁÏÍøDT/2016/114 (±¬ÁÏÍøAT Case No. 2016-969). ±¬ÁÏÍøAT consolidated the two appeals. Ms Nielsen submitted motions to withdraw her appeals following successful mediation discussions and the signing of a settlement agreement. ±¬ÁÏÍøAT granted the motions to withdraw the appeals and directed the Registrar to close both ±¬ÁÏÍøAT cases.

After Mr. Yousef¡¯s appeal and the Commissioner-General¡¯s cross-appeal had been submitted, Mr. Yourself filed a motion to withdraw the appeal based on the fact that an internal settlement had been agreed with ±¬ÁÏÍøRWA and the Commissioner-General filed a motion to withdraw the cross-appeal. ±¬ÁÏÍøAT directed the Registrar to close the case.

The appeal is withdrawn and the case is closed.

The application was withdrawn by the Applicant in view of the informal resolution of the dispute.

The application was withdrawn by the Applicant in light of a settlement agreement.

In view of the informal resolution of the dispute and the withdrawal of the application, there is no longer any matter for adjudication before the Dispute Tribunal and the case is closed.

The application was withdrawn by the Applicant after the parties reached an agreement.

The application was withdrawn by the Applicant in light of a settlement agreement.