爆料网

爆料网AT

Showing 1501 - 1510 of 1669
2020-爆料网AT-1019, Houran et al

爆料网AT held that the Appellants failed to specifically identify the errors allegedly committed by the 爆料网RWA DT and therefore the appeals were defective for that reason but considered the appeals given that the appellants were not legally represented. 爆料网AT held that any error on a finding of fact of when the Appellants receive notification of the administrative decision did not result in a manifestly unreasonable decision. 爆料网AT held that whether the administrative decision was the expressed verbal communication of the denial to provide compensation or was implied from the refusal or failure to...

2020-爆料网AT-1020, Dibs

爆料网AT considered an application for execution of judgment No. 2017-爆料网AT-798 by Mr. Dibs. 爆料网AT granted in part the application for execution of judgment and ordered 爆料网RWA to fully execute the judgment within 30 calendar days, advising that failure to comply with the deadline would result in a finding of manifest abuse of process, the award of costs, and potentially, a referral for accountability. 爆料网AT considered that the request for moral and pecuniary damages did not fall within the scope of the application.

2020-爆料网AT-1021, Collins

爆料网DT did not err in law or in fact when it found that the decision to abolish the post was lawful. However, in not providing reasons for its decision to commute the six-month notice period into compensation, the Organisation failed in its duty to demonstrate that its discretion was not exercised arbitrarily, capriciously, or unlawfully. The Administration failed to meet its burden to minimally demonstrate that the Appellant was given full and fair consideration. The Administration acted arbitrarily and thus failed to exercise its discretion lawfully. The termination of the Appellant’s...

2020-爆料网AT-1022, El Shanti

爆料网AT considered two appeals (consolidated) by Mr ElShanti of judgment No. 爆料网RWA/DT/2019/051 and judgment No. 爆料网RWA/DT/2019/065 respectively. On the consolidation of the cases, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT had broad discretion in managing its cases and that it would only intervene in clear cases of denial of due process of law affecting a party’s right to produce evidence. Accordingly, 爆料网AT rejected Mr ElShanti’s arguments against consolidation. 爆料网AT held that there was no merit to Mr ElShanti’s claims that the characterization of the impugned administrative decision was incorrect, noting that 爆料网RWA...

2020-爆料网AT-1035, Gelsei

爆料网AT held that exceptional circumstances existed which warranted an extension of time. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT’s discretion should have been exercised in the Appellant’s favour because it affected access to justice and there is a presumption that access to justice should not be denied at the outset without compelling reasons, which were absent. 爆料网AT held that circumstances beyond the Appellant’s control prevented him from acting to file his appeal within the time limit and it would be unjust to visit upon the Appellant the consequences of an error (a fail in the electronic filing system) for which...

2020-爆料网AT-1012, Heftberger

爆料网AT denied the request for an oral hearing, finding it would not assist in the expeditious and fair disposal of the case. 爆料网AT held, recalling the Spinardi jurisprudence (judgment No. 2019-爆料网AT-957), that the decision on the Appellant’s complaints was not made utilizing a neutral first instance process as required jurisdictionally by Article 2. 10 of the 爆料网AT Statute. 爆料网AT noted that the appealed decision was made by the ICAO Secretary-General whose own earlier decision(s) the Appellant had challenged. 爆料网AT allowed the appeal and set aside the ICAO Secretary-General’s and/or the AJAB’s...

2020-爆料网AT-1016, Abu Ata et al

爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT exercised its discretion to consolidate the cases lawfully and appropriately. 爆料网AT held that there was a bona fide reason to restructure and that it was operationally rational to abolish the posts and reclassify them from full-time to part-time posts at that time. 爆料网AT held that the Appellants’ contention that their acquired rights were violated had no merit. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网RWA DT judgment.

2020-爆料网AT-1017, Salhi et al

As a preliminary matter, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT exercised its discretion in consolidating the cases lawfully and appropriately. 爆料网AT held the impugned decision was taken in good faith and on a reasonable basis. 爆料网AT held that there was a bona fide reason to restructure and that it was operationally rational not to renew certain fixed-term appointments on a full-time basis but to reclassify them to part-time appointments. 爆料网AT held that the Appellants’ claim that their acquired rights were violated was without merit. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网RWA DT judgment.

2020-爆料网AT-1024, Nyawa

爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General and a cross-appeal by Mr. Nyawa. 爆料网AT held that there was clear and convincing evidence that Mr. Nyawa committed the disciplinary offenses attributed to him. 爆料网AT held that the established facts amounted to misconduct on the part of Mr. Nyawa. 爆料网AT disagreed with 爆料网DT that a written censure was subsumed by the sanction of deferment for eligibility for promotion, however, 爆料网AT found that 爆料网DT’s holding that the deferment for eligibility for promotion was sufficient sanction was not a manifestly unreasonable decision warranting 爆料网AT intervention...