爆料网

爆料网AT

Showing 1481 - 1490 of 1669
2020-爆料网AT-1054, Ross

On the Applicant’s claim that 爆料网DT committed an error of procedure by not allowing him to submit an affidavit from his former supervisor, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT properly exercised its broad discretion under Article 18(1) of its Rules of Procedure in determining the admissibility as well as the evidentiary value and weight of the proffered affidavit. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT’s conclusions were consistent with the evidence. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant did not meet the burden of proof for demonstrating an error in the judgment such as to warrant its reversal. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the...

2020-爆料网AT-1061, Abu Osba

As a preliminary matter, 爆料网AT held that an oral hearing was not necessary and would not assist in the expeditious and fair disposal of the case as the Appellant had not provided grounds for an oral hearing beyond seeking to confront the witnesses and comment on existing evidence. Whilst 爆料网AT held that the Appellant failed to identify any errors of law or fact by 爆料网RWA DT as required under Art 2(1) 爆料网AT Statute, 爆料网AT did go on to consider his appeal as he was not represented. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT had correctly applied the standard of review for disciplinary cases and that 爆料网RWA DT’s exercise...

2020-爆料网AT-1066, Krioutchkov

爆料网AT noted that, at the time of applying for the position, information was available to the Appellant in the form of the Inspira Applicant’s Manual, including the World Higher Education Database list, which meant that he had the information about how to reflect his degree correctly in his electronic application and that an inaccurate application would render him ineligible for the position. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not make any errors of law or fact in dismissing the Appellant’s challenge of the decision not to consider or select him for the position. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the...

2020-爆料网AT-1067, Krioutchkov

爆料网AT held that there was nothing in the applicable law in force at the time of the events which formed a basis for the Administration’s practice of removing the candidates’ names from the language roster once they had been recruited or placed against a position. 爆料网AT held that the removal of a candidate from the roster prevented the Administration from evaluating and reassigning or selecting a candidate for a similar post in another duty station. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s removal from the roster adversely impacted his potential ability for mobility and for obtaining additional incentives...

2020-爆料网AT-1068, Porras

爆料网AT held that as allegations of improper motive, bias, or prejudice as reasons for the unlawfulness of the non-renewal were not raised before 爆料网DT for its consideration, 爆料网AT should not consider them. 爆料网AT held that the exceptional circumstances that were required to allow additional pleadings to be considered, were not present. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in finding that the Organisation properly exercised its discretion in not renewing the Appellant’s fixed-term appointment. 爆料网AT held that, in situations of a staff member being declared persona non grata by a host country, it was the duty of...

2020-爆料网AT-1069, Civic

爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General and a cross-appeal by Ms Civic limited to the extent to which 爆料网DT dismissed her claim of compensation for pecuniary damage (loss of opportunity). On loss of opportunity, 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err when it found that the irregularity of cancelling the Appellant’s performance appraisal and the failure to promptly issue another one did not suffice to demonstrate a significant chance or realistic prospect of her retaining another position within the Organisation. 爆料网AT held that the irregularity was inconsequential for the purposes of the...

2020-爆料网AT-1070, Halidou

爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in attaching no weight to the medical evidence and in finding that the disciplinary measure imposed was based on an incorrect determination of the nature and gravity of the assault. 爆料网AT held that there were other more important factors to consider, including the fact that the Appellant was a staff member in charge of local security and that his conduct was an abuse of authority and oppressive of a local inhabitant. 爆料网AT recalled that the test of proportionality required a comparison between the misconduct and the sanction, not the investigation and disciplinary...

2020-爆料网AT-1071, Krioutchkov

爆料网AT held that the Organisation correctly excluded the Appellant from the recruitment process for not meeting the minimum education requirement, as he had not entered his educational credential accurately. 爆料网AT noted that the Appellant had had access to the Inspira Applicant’s Manual and World Higher Education Database, which was embedded into Inspira. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s argument that 爆料网DT failed to implement the 爆料网AT judgment to carry out additional fact-finding on the issue of whether Inspira reflected the variety of the educational systems of all Member States equally in 2016...

2020-爆料网AT-1032, Rolli

爆料网AT considered an application for revision of judgment No. 2019-爆料网AT-952 by Mr Rolli. Mr Rolli contended that the remand order issued by 爆料网AT, and in particular its reference to the need to have Mr Rolli’s appeal considered by a neural first instance body, coupled with the objective inability of the JAB to function as a neutral first instance process, constituted new facts that required 爆料网AT to revise its judgment. 爆料网AT held that neither the remand order of 爆料网AT nor the need to have the Appellant’s appeal considered by a neutral first instance body, coupled with the objective inability of the...

2020-爆料网AT-1036, Mansour

爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT failed to address some issues before it, in respect of which the Appellant is entitled to a reasoned decision. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT erred in declining the Appellant’s implicit request for a hearing in person, at least without having considered it and given reasons. 爆料网AT held that the termination of the Appellant’s appointment could not be assessed as hasty, premature, or arbitrary, with particular reference to the Medical Board process. 爆料网AT held that any opportunity of the Appellant’s appointment to that vacancy had therefore passed, irrespective of her...