爆料网

English

Showing 3731 - 3740 of 4321
爆料网DT/2019/086, Olowo-Okello

爆料网DT held that supplying additional circumstances as reasons for not rehiring the Applicant in 2018 did not revive the contested decision of 2016. 爆料网DT held that the Applicant failed to submit a request for management evaluation of the contested decision within the required deadlines. 爆料网DT held that there was no evidence that the Applicant and the Administration were in any way involved in an Ombudsman-driven negotiation process which may have implicitly extended the management evaluation deadline. 爆料网DT held that although the Applicant claims to have been blocked from rehiring, he did not...

爆料网DT/2019/087, Atuya

爆料网DT noted that the Applicant had all the information necessary to seek management evaluation of the contested decisions and that the time limit for seeking management evaluation started running on 31 March 2018, which meant that the 60-day deadline for submitting a management evaluation request was 30 May 2018. The Applicant sought management evaluation of the decisions only on 29 June 2018, 29 days out of time. 爆料网DT agreed with the Respondent that the Applicant’s claim that she was unable to “deal with the issue until she was released from the medical facility” on 28 May 2018 was unsupported...

爆料网DT/2019/093, Mohamed

爆料网DT held that the requirements of ST/AI/2003/3 were not satisfied since the Applicant was not serving on a higher-level post or regularly performing functions at the P-5 level. 爆料网DT noted that the Applicant was serving on a post that was budgeted and classified at the P-4 level. 爆料网DT further noted that there is no P-5 post within the Conference Management and Translation Unit. 爆料网DT accordingly held that the Applicant did not satisfy the criteria for a Special Post Allowance. 爆料网DT dismissed all claims.

爆料网DT/2019/146, Abu Amra

The Applicant’s request for management evaluation of 5 February is vague and fails to articulate the precise administrative decision he is contesting. It ambiguously mentions the recruitment processes for Job Openings (JOs) 108789 and 109656, the termination of his continuing appointment and the lack of effort by the Organization to find him a new post. Since the application makes no mention of the selection processes for JOs 108789 and 109656, the Tribunal will not address it. Consequently, the Tribunal’s review will focus solely on whether the claims against the termination of the Applicant...

爆料网DT/2019/149, Nyawa

Regarding the question of whether material facts were sufficiently established, the Tribunal concluded that they were sufficiently established except the allegations that the Applicant instructed other staff members to provide false information. The parties disputed whether the Applicant was a supervisor as charged. The Applicant did not fall under the category of “supervisor “ as per the 爆料网ON Security and Safety Service (爆料网ON/SSS) SOP No 13. Undisputedly though, the Applicant carried out team leader functions and the 爆料网ON/SSS Daily Orders which assigned the Applicant to provide “security...

爆料网DT/2019/079, Thiombiano

爆料网DT held that the decision to extend the Applicant’s fixed-term appointment with effect from 11 September 2015 until 29 February 2016 was irreceivable because the Applicant failed to submit a request for management evaluation of the decision. 爆料网DT found no basis for the Applicant’s claim that his appointment had been converted into a continuing one. 爆料网DT held that the procedural irregularity in issuing the retroactive fixed-term appointments could cause vexation but did not amount to a serious violation of rights. 爆料网DT held that the delays did not entail an ex lege conversion to a continuing...

爆料网DT/2019/082, Sawenjah

爆料网DT held that the Applicant, not being a staff member of 爆料网OPS or any other entity of the 爆料网, had no locus standi before 爆料网DT in relation to the termination decision. Noting that the Applicant did not request management evaluation for either of the contested decisions, 爆料网DT held that it could not consider the merits of the case. 爆料网DT rejected the application as irreceivable.

爆料网DT/2019/085, Avramoski

爆料网DT held that the request for management evaluation was not time-barred. 爆料网DT held that the rules and procedures applied to establish the Applicant’s EOD date were due consequences of the fact that she had been reappointed in 2008. 爆料网DT held that the choice of reappointment as modality of the Applicant’s move was borne out by personnel actions of separation and reappointment and acknowledged by her in the memorandum of understanding with respect to annual leave from 2008. Accordingly, 爆料网DT held that the matter was outside the temporal jurisdiction of 爆料网DT. 爆料网DT held that the EOD date as...