��DT/2019/082

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

��DT held that the Applicant, not being a staff member of ��OPS or any other entity of the ��, had no locus standi before ��DT in relation to the termination decision. Noting that the Applicant did not request management evaluation for either of the contested decisions, ��DT held that it could not consider the merits of the case. ��DT rejected the application as irreceivable.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested two decisions: (1) the termination of his contract by ��OPS where he served as an individual contractor and (2) the ��deduction of money�� by ��DP where he served as a staff member.

Legal Principle(s)

��DT has no jurisdiction to hear applications from non-staff members, which includes individual contractors.

Outcome

Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Sawenjah

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement