爆料网

Jurisdiction / receivability (爆料网DT or first instance)

  • Management Evaluation
  • Management evaluation
  • Management evaluation
  • Manifest excess of jurisdiction
  • Personal (ratione personae)
  • Subject matter (ratione materiae)
  • Temporal (ratione temporis)
  • Temporel (ratione temporis)
    • Showing 421 - 430 of 1228
    2017-爆料网AT-766, Alsado

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that the decision to terminate Mr Alsado due to abolition of post was never implemented because he obtained another position with the Organisation and that this rendered moot the Administration’s decision to terminate him. 爆料网AT held that the administrative decision was no longer a live issue and 爆料网DT was not competent to pass judgment on the application. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT made an error of law when it found Mr Alsado’s application receivable. 爆料网AT held that in light of the 爆料网DT’s error in receiving the application, the 爆料网DT’s...

    2017-爆料网AT-767, Wright

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that the decision to terminate Mr Wright’s permanent appointment was never implemented because he obtained another position with the Organisation and that this rendered moot the Administration’s decision to terminate him. 爆料网AT held that the administrative decision was no longer a live issue and 爆料网DT was not competent to pass judgment on the application. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT made an error of law when it found Mr Wright’s application receivable. 爆料网AT held that in light of the 爆料网DT’s error in receiving the application, the 爆料网DT’s...

    2017-爆料网AT-750, Kagizi et al.

    爆料网AT consolidated the 51 appeals into seven groups heard by seven judicial panels, the first group (Kagizi et al. judgment No. 爆料网DT/2016/131) being heard by the full bench. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeals. 爆料网AT confirmed 爆料网DT’s finding that the appellants lacked standing to challenge the non-renewal of their appointments in so far as they were deemed to be a direct challenge against the General Assembly’s decision to abolish the posts. 爆料网AT noted that, while in other aspects, 爆料网DT regarded the applications as receivable and dealt with the merits of the case, those findings were not substantially...

    2017-爆料网AT-760, Sa'adeddin

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT correctly found that the application was not receivable to the extent that it contested decisions taken. 爆料网AT upheld the 爆料网RWA DT’s findings that the provisions in the GMIP were mandatory for the 爆料网RWA, that the GMIP does not include a provision with respect to retroactivity, and that 爆料网RWA has no discretionary authority to enrol former staff members if this is not allowed in the contract. 爆料网AT held that the GMIP could not apply outside of its scope of application. 爆料网AT held that there was no evidence that 爆料网RWA DT erred on the law or the facts, and that the Appellant’s...

    2017-爆料网AT-756, Nkashama et al.

    爆料网AT held that the Appellants had raised neither factual difference nor legal issues different from those canvassed in companion cases and disposed of in judgment No. 2017-爆料网AT-750 (Kagizi et al. ) and therefore 爆料网AT adopted the reasoning from its prior judgment at paragraphs 18-27. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeals and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgments.

    2017-爆料网AT-761, Michaud

    As a preliminary matter, 爆料网AT denied the Appellant’s motion to adduce additional evidence in the form of an affidavit by him for the absence of exceptional circumstances. 爆料网AT held that the Office of Audit and Investigation Services (OAIS) took no decision that materially, adversely, or directly impacted the rights of the Appellant and that it merely made a non-binding recommendation to 爆料网DP. 爆料网AT held that the recommendation by OAIS was not an administrative decision. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT was correct to hold that the appeal in relation to the investigation was not receivable ratione materiae...

    2017-爆料网AT-755, Ramazani et al.

    爆料网AT held that the Appellants had raised neither factual difference nor legal issues different from those canvassed in companion cases and disposed of in judgment No. 2017-爆料网AT-750 (Kagizi et al. ) and therefore 爆料网AT adopted the reasoning from its prior judgment at paragraphs 18-27. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeals and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgments.

    2017-爆料网AT-754, Kisubi et al.

    爆料网AT held that the Appellants had raised neither factual difference nor legal issues different from those canvassed in companion cases and disposed of in judgment No. 2017-爆料网AT-750 (Kagizi et al. ) and therefore 爆料网AT adopted the reasoning from its prior judgment at paragraphs 18-27. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeals and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgments.

    2017-爆料网AT-751, Wanza et al.

    爆料网AT held that the Appellants had raised neither factual differences nor legal issues different from those canvassed in companion cases and disposed of in judgment No. 2017-爆料网AT-750 (Kagizi et al.). 爆料网AT, therefore, adopted the reasoning from its prior judgment in paragraphs 18-27. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeals and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgments.

    2017-爆料网AT-753, Kiluwe et al.

    爆料网AT held that the Appellants had raised neither factual difference nor legal issues different from those canvassed in companion cases and disposed of in judgment No. 2017-爆料网AT-750 (Kagizi et al. ) and therefore 爆料网AT adopted the reasoning from its prior judgment at paragraphs 18-27. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeals and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgments.