爆料网

Jurisdiction / receivability (爆料网DT or first instance)

  • Management Evaluation
  • Management evaluation
  • Management evaluation
  • Manifest excess of jurisdiction
  • Personal (ratione personae)
  • Subject matter (ratione materiae)
  • Temporal (ratione temporis)
  • Temporel (ratione temporis)
    • Showing 251 - 260 of 1228
    2011-爆料网AT-108, Ajdini et al.

    爆料网AT considered an appeal of 爆料网DT Order No. 50 (GVA/2010) by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that the issue under consideration was settled, as 爆料网AT had consistently held that 爆料网DT had no jurisdiction to waive deadlines for management evaluation or administrative review. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred on a question of law in determining that it had the authority to waive the deadlines for administrative review. 爆料网AT allowed the appeal and set aside the 爆料网DT Order.

    2012-爆料网AT-279, Sanbar

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT had correctly dismissed the application as not receivable for being time-barred. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT had correctly found the application not receivable ratione materiae since the Appellant had not contested an administrative decision and had erroneously filed his appeal with the International Joint Appeals Board. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网RWA DT judgment.

    2012-爆料网AT-278, Balogun

    爆料网AT held that, when the Appellant contested before 爆料网AdT his separation from the Organisation, he should have also submitted the request for payment of a termination indemnity, to be able to collect it if he did not succeed in the first part of his application. 爆料网AT held that the decision of the Management Evaluation Unit to consider the Appellant’s request not receivable as time-barred was correct. 爆料网AT held that, even though the Appellant revisited the issue of his separation on several occasions under the old system, he might have been misguided into believing that he could bring the...

    2012-爆料网AT-273, Rosana

    爆料网AT held that that 爆料网DT had correctly established that the silence of the 爆料网EP management constituted an implied administrative decision and that this decision was taken on 31 August 2009. 爆料网AT held the Appellant’s request for management evaluation was time-barred and that the application was, therefore, not receivable. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.

    2012-爆料网AT-268, Bangoura

    爆料网AT considered appeals by both Mr Bangoura and the Secretary-General. Mr Bangoura requested oral hearings was rejected. 爆料网AT held that the case would be decided on law and that the pertinent documents were on record. Regarding the Secretary-General’s appeal, 爆料网AT noted that the staff member had requested the execution of a part of judgment No. 1029 of the former 爆料网 Administrative Tribunal and that Tribunal had established a procedure for staff members wishing to challenge the non-execution of a judgment. 爆料网AT held that the staff member needed to make a request for review of the administrative...

    2012-爆料网AT-269, Hamad

    爆料网AT held that 爆料网RWA DT was correct in applying Former 爆料网RWA Area Staff Rule 106. 1. 16 to calculate the interest applicable to the Appellant’s pay-out and that 爆料网RWA DT had not erred in this regard. 爆料网AT held that the contention that the Administrative Rules of the United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund apply to the Appellant’s situation had no merit and had been raised for the first time on appeal. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant had failed to demonstrate that 爆料网RWA DT had erred in finding that the Appellant’s terms and conditions of employment are governed solely and exclusively by the Agency...

    2012-爆料网AT-271, Cremades

    爆料网AT held that the appeal was without merit and that the request for management evaluation was filed in an untimely manner. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant had failed to demonstrate that informal resolution efforts had been taken which could extend the time limit. 爆料网AT noted that the Appellant had not requested such an extension of the time limit. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had correctly decided that the request for management evaluation was not receivable as it was time-barred. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.

    2012-爆料网AT-275, Cooke

    爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT, under Article 8.3 of its Statute, was authorised to waive the time limits for filing applications in certain situations but that the staff member had failed to submit a written request for a waiver and to justify exceptional circumstances. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT could not consider whether exceptional circumstances existed unless the staff had submitted a prior written request for waiver. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had interpreted Articles 19 and 35 of the 爆料网DT RoP in a manner that conflicted with Articles 8.1 and 8.3 of the 爆料网DT...

    2012-爆料网AT-267, Achkar

    爆料网AT rejected the request for an oral hearing since there was no need for further clarification of the issues arising from the appeal. 爆料网AT held that it had subject matter jurisdiction to hear the appeal and that the appeal was receivable. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had correctly concluded that it had no subject matter jurisdiction to receive the application because the application was brought before the wrong tribunal and the application should have been brought before 爆料网RWA DT. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had correctly concluded that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction to receive the application because...

    2012-爆料网AT-265, Ljungdell

    Regarding the allegations that 爆料网DT erred in law, fact, and procedure and failed to exercise its jurisdiction in relation to her allegations of discrimination, 爆料网AT held that the burden was on the Appellant to establish that the oral and documentary evidence, if admitted, would have led to different findings of fact, and changed the outcome of the case. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had not erred in rejecting the Appellant’s allegations that she had been subjected to discrimination on the grounds of gender or based on her family responsibilities and her expressed desire to work part-time. Regarding the...