2012-惇蹋厙AT-271

惇蹋厙AT Held or 惇蹋厙DT Pronouncements

惇蹋厙AT held that the appeal was without merit and that the request for management evaluation was filed in an untimely manner. 惇蹋厙AT held that the Appellant had failed to demonstrate that informal resolution efforts had been taken which could extend the time limit. 惇蹋厙AT noted that the Appellant had not requested such an extension of the time limit. 惇蹋厙AT held that 惇蹋厙DT had correctly decided that the request for management evaluation was not receivable as it was time-barred. 惇蹋厙AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 惇蹋厙DT judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision to reject her request to the Chief of the Human Resources Management Service (HRMS), 惇蹋厙OG, to extend her contract until 31 August 2009 in order to cover the annual leave corresponding to the first two trimesters of 2009 or, alternatively, to pay her compensation for work performed up to 31 July 2009 and for her proportional annual leave entitlement relating to that period. 惇蹋厙DT dismissed the application as not receivable. The Applicant appealed.

Legal Principle(s)

惇蹋厙DT has no authority to suspend or waive the deadlines for management evaluation. Ignorance of the law is no excuse for failing to meet the time limits to request administrative review or management evaluation.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the 惇蹋厙DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the 惇蹋厙AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Cremades

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement