��DT/2020/041

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

The Tribunal��s role is not to substitute its decision for that of the Administration when it comes to the evaluation of job candidates. All that is required from the Administration is that it minimally shows that the Applicant��s candidature was given a full and fair consideration. The applicable legal framework allowed the consideration of gender and geographical diversity in the recruitment process.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

��ICEF��s decision not to select the Applicant for the post of Senior Statistics Specialist (Poverty and Gender) at the P-5 level in the Division of Data, Research and Policy.

Legal Principle(s)

��DT��s limited judicial review of a non-selection case The presumption of regularity of selection decisions Geographical and gender diversity.

Outcome

Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Evans

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement