��DT/2017/031

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

The Applicant requests revision of ��DT/2017/012 on the grounds that the Tribunal did not consider his closing statement. The Tribunal concludes that there are no legal reasons for the Judgment to be revised. The Tribunal also notes that the reason invoked in the application for revision may be submitted as a ground of appeal, if any, before the United Nations Appeals Tribunal.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant requests revision of judgment Chhikara ��DT/2017/012.

Legal Principle(s)

Closing submissions are summaries which are to be prepared and filed by the parties based solely on the submissions and evidence already presented before the Tribunal.

Outcome

Revision, correction, interpretation or execution

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Chhikara

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement