��DT/2016/176

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

The Tribunal dismissed the application in its entirety.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant, a former Security Officer with the Security and Safety Services in the Department of Safety and Security filed an application requesting the Tribunal to (a) provide an interpretation of para. 51, 53 and 55(a) and (b) of Judgment Kisia No. ��DT/2016/040 in Case No. ��DT/NY/2014/061 (Kisia), (b) issue an order for the execution of Kisia ��DT/2016/040, and (c) grant the Applicant non�Cpecuniary damages for the alleged delay in executing Kisia ��DT/2016/040.

Legal Principle(s)

Admissibility of a request for interpretation: The Appeals Tribunal set out the test for when a request for interpretation is admissible in Abbasi 2013-��AT-315.Timing of execution of a judgment: In most cases, the execution of a judgment requires only one executional act (uno ictu). However, the execution of Kisia ��DT/2016/040 consists of several steps to be followed due to the specificity of the procedure which involves different decisional levels.Evidence of moral damages: In Dahan ��DT/2015/053 and Mutiso ��DT/2015/059 (neither judgment was appealed), the Dispute Tribunal concluded that the evidence on moral damage can, for instance, be produced in pleadings and documents on record which demonstrate a clear showing of harm.

Outcome

Revision, correction, interpretation or execution

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Kisia

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement