��DT/2013/025

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

He alleged that the non-renewal of his appointment was based on discriminatory grounds, i.e. because of his Kurdish ethnicity, and not for reasons of force majeure, namely due to the occurred earthquake, leading to the subsequent closure of the ��HCR office in Van/Turkey. The ��DT found that the decision not to renew his appointment was lawful, as the Applicant failed to adduce evidence of any breach of his rights.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant, a former staff member of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (��HCR��) in Van/Turkey, contests the decision not to renew his fixed-term appointment beyond 31 December 2011.

Legal Principle(s)

Reasons for non-renewal/burden of proof of extraneous factors: If an Applicant contests the legality of a non-renewal decision, she/he has the burden of proving that the true reason behind a decision is unlawful.

Outcome

Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Kacan

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement