��DT/2013/017

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

The ��DT found that the application was time-barred as the Applicant had failed to file it within 90 calendar days of receipt of the response to his request for management evaluation, as required by art. 8.1(d) of the Statute. The Applicant also failed to refer to any exceptional circumstances that would justify the delayed filing of his application and that would warrant a waiver or extension of the applicable time limits.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant, a former staff member of the United Nations Children��s Fund (��ICEF��), filed an application contesting the non-renewal of his contract on the grounds of unsatisfactory performance.

Legal Principle(s)

Time limits: As the United Nations Appeals Tribunal stated in Mezoui 2010-��AT-043, time limits are to be enforced strictly.

Outcome

Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Prakash

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement