��DT/2012/195

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

Receivability: Decisions by the Ethics Office are administrative decisions that are subject to appeal before the Tribunal, since they may directly affect staff members�� rights. A request for management evaluation has to be sought prior to the filing of the application and hence her request to regularize her application a posteriori could only be rejected, in accordance with staff rule 11.2, namely the required antecedence of the request for management evaluation to the application.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision of the Ethics Office by which it decided that the settlement agreement concluded between the Applicant and the International Trade Centre (ITC) through the United Nations Ombudsman and Mediation Services (��OMS) does not constitute a protected activity within the scope of ST/SGB/2005/21 (Ethics Office - establishment and terms of reference). The Applicant did not submit the contested administrative decision for management evaluation prior to the filing of the Application, asserting that it was superfluous given that the Secretary-General refuses to acknowledge decisions by the Ethics Office as administrative decisions subject to appeal before the Tribunal. The ��DT found that the application is not receivable since the Applicant is not exempted from requesting management evaluation before seeking relief from the Tribunal as clearly stipulated in staff rule 11.2.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome

Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Servas

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement