��DT/2011/179

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

The fact that OSLA counsel have fulfilled in the past other functions within the Organization does not generally disqualify them from discharging their new duties. Outcome: Application rejected on the merits

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant complained about the non-disclosure of a conflict of interest, which he claimed stemmed from the fact that the Chief of OSLA had served, prior to his taking up his current functions, with ��HCR, whose management had made the contested decisions in the cases he intended to file with OSLA assistance. By a previous judgment, the Tribunal rejected the application as irreceivable, but also finding that it had no merits. The Appeals Tribunal remanded the case for a trial on the merits. The Tribunal found that the alleged conflict of interest could not reasonably be seen to exist. The mere prior employment relationship of the Chief of OSLA with ��HCR falls short of supporting the conclusion that OSLA was prevented from correctly discharging its mandate. Hence, there was not obligation to disclose on the part of OSLA.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome

Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Larkin

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement