��DT/2011/118

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

��DT nted that the Applicants�� requests for management evaluation were submitted after the applicable deadline had already expired. ��DT noted that, while the Applicants were active and diligent in bringing their concerns and grievances to higher authorities, these actions did not constitute sending a request for management evaluation. ��DT held that the application for suspension of action was irreceivable as time-barred. ��DT rejected the application for suspension of action.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicants requested suspension of the implementation of the decision not to renew their fixed-term appointments beyond 30 June 2011.

Legal Principle(s)

Ignorance of the law is no excuse and every staff member is deemed to be aware of the provisions of the Staff Rules (Diagne et al. 2010-��AT-067).

Outcome

Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Fetahu et al

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal