��DT/2011/065

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

��DT noted that the contested decision was superseded by the 31 March 2011 decision to extend the Applicant��s appointment for another six months. ��DT held that the application was thus rendered moot and decided to close the case.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the 1 December 2010 decision not to extend his fixed-term appointment beyond its expiry.

Legal Principle(s)

Left deliberately blank.

Outcome

Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Tranchant

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement