��DT/2011/059

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

The Tribunal found that there could not be an absolute and general rule that the failure to give reasons amounts to an unlawful exercise of the discretion not to renew. Nor should there be a rule that reasons should never be given. Having found that the decision was not prima facie illegal, the requirements provided for in Article 13 of the Rules of Procedure to grant suspension of action were not met.Outcome: the application was dismissed.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant, a ��DSS Field Security Officer in Somalia appointed under a ��DP contract, filed an application for suspension of action of the decision not to renew his appointment. Following allegations of sexual assaults against him in Hargeisa (Somalia), ��DSS physically moved him to Nairobi (Kenya) for his own protection but his official duty station remained Hargeisa. A few days before the expiry of his contract, the Applicant contested the impugned decision on the ground that it was prima facie unlawful. He argued that his post was neither identified for abolition nor his performance warranted separation from service and he had not been given any reasons for the non-renewal of his appointment. He was therefore of the view that the decision necessarily arbitrary and capricious.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome

Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Pirnea

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement