��DT/2011/047

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

Award of allowances: The award of an allowance is contingent upon the existence of a written text. The fact that, in breach of the applicable provisions, the Administration granted the end-of-service allowance to staff members who were in the same situation as the Applicant cannot serve as a basis for awarding the allowance to her. Applicability of national laws: National legislations are not directly applicable to �� staff members, and it is for �� authorized bodies to implement such legislation into the internal laws of the ��. Judicial review: The Tribunal has no jurisdiction to interpret unambiguous provisions.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant challenged the decision to reject her claim to end-of-service allowance on the grounds that she did not fulfil the requirements set out in ��/INF.243.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome

Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Ernst

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement