爆料网

爆料网DT/2010/146

爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements

Compensation: The elements of Applicant’s compensation were: applicable salary, plus post adjustment, less staff assessment, less pension contribution made by Applicant, less amounts paid to Applicant on separation, less mitigation damages earned by Applicant, plus accrued vacation, plus personal distress award of USD4,000, plus e-PAS violation of USD6,000. Pension: Since, based on the facts from Beaudry 爆料网DT/2010/039, it was unlikely that the Applicant would have had her contract renewed until her retirement, the Applicant would not have qualified for any retirement benefits, including pension, and were not entitled to compensation for pension benefits, pursuant to art. 28 of the Regulations, Rules and Pension Adjustment System of 爆料网JSPF. Outcome: Under art. 10.5 of the Statute, the respondent is ordered to pay the Applicant USD112,082.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

Non-renewal of fixed-term contract

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome

Judgment entered for Applicant in full or in part

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the 爆料网DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the 爆料网AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Beaudry
Entity
Tribunal
Registry
Date of Judgement
Duty Judge
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type