��DT/2009/026

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

��DT noted that the Applicant, having received the contested decision on 4 February 2009, did not file her application with this Tribunal until 14 July 2009, which was beyond the 90 calendar-day deadline set forth in Article 8 of the ��DT Statute. ��DT noted that before it can reject an application, it must determine whether failure to meet the deadline could have resulted from erroneous information provided by the Administration. ��DT held that the Applicant was not given any information that could have misled her, because, as she herself wrote, it was not until after 1 July 2009 that she received the reply from the Executive Secretary of the Administrative Tribunal to her request for an extension of the deadline. By that time, her application could no longer be deemed receivable by the Administrative Tribunal and was filed before ��DT beyond the prescribed time limit. ��DT accordingly held that the application was not receivable.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the Secretary-General��s decision to accept the recommendation of the Joint Appeals Board that she should be paid compensation equivalent to three months�� salary for not having received the full and fair consideration to which she was entitled during the staff selection process for the post of Director (D-2), Office for Economic and Social Council Support and Coordination.

Legal Principle(s)

Before ��DT can reject an application, it must determine whether failure to meet the deadline could have resulted from erroneous information provided by the Administration.

Outcome

Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Mezoui

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement