��DT/2009/001

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

��DT noted that the procedure to be followed for the given position to be re-titled and re-classified had not been completed by the time the Applicant submitted her request to the ��DT. ��DT concluded that no administrative decision had yet been made by the time the request for suspension of action was submitted to ��DT and considered by same. ��DT therefore held that the request had to be considered inadmissible, nothing preventing the Applicant from contesting the forthcoming decision.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant requested suspension of the decision to re-title and re-classify her current P-4 post during the pendency of the management evaluation.

Legal Principle(s)

Only an administrative decision may be the object of a request for suspension of action before the Tribunal.

Outcome

Dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Tsoneva

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement