爆料网

2024-爆料网AT-1508

爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements

The 爆料网AT noted that the Administration had initiated a preliminary investigation into the staff member’s conduct with regard to the ostensible theft of cash from the office safe, reached agreements with him regarding repayment, and then sought initiation of criminal proceedings by filing a criminal complaint and delivering him to the local police. The 爆料网AT found that because the underlying facts of the case involved his conduct as a United Nations staff member towards his employer, the 爆料网DT should have been competent to review his application on the merits, had it been timely filed.

The 爆料网AT was of the view that the 爆料网DT had been correct in finding that the staff member had failed to request management evaluation in a timely manner and that his application was not receivable.

The 爆料网AT held that the staff member had known of the Administration’s actions with respect to the criminal proceedings when he affirmed that, if he failed to return the lost funds, police action should be taken against him and, after failing to make full repayment, he was taken by United Nations staff to the local authorities, and imprisoned. The 爆料网AT found that in light of this objective reality, the later formality of viewing the criminal complaint had not extended or re-started the time for him to request management evaluation.

The 爆料网AT held that the retention, by the Organization, of the funds he had deposited had not been a continuous decision but merely a carrying out of the initial decision to demand and accept repayment and it had not extended the deadline to request management evaluation.

The 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT Judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

A former staff member contested several decisions: (a) an implied decision to refer the allegation of theft, of which he was accused, to Burundian national authorities; (b) an implied decision to waive his immunity in relation to the theft case; and (c) a decision to retain monies paid by him to the United Nations in connection with the theft allegation.

In Judgment No. 爆料网DT/2023/114, the 爆料网DT dismissed the application as not receivable.

The staff member appealed.

Legal Principle(s)

The Appeals Tribunal has consistently held that the date of an explicit and an implied administrative decision is based on objective elements that both parties can accurately determine.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the 爆料网DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the 爆料网AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Adolphe Irambona
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry
Date of Judgement
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type