爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements
The 爆料网AT noted that in light of multiple competing requests for lateral transfer, the staff member had not been one of the candidates who was recommended and selected for the position because her responsibilities had been different from the duties of the requested position, and the Agency sought candidates more familiar with those duties.
The 爆料网AT held that under the relevant legal provisions governing lateral transfers, read together and not in isolation, the Agency had been authorized to base its assessment on the candidates’ suitability for the post instead of seniority, compelling reasons, and performance evaluation.
The 爆料网AT considered that exercising discretion to hire persons whose duties were similar to the requirements of the role and who were more familiar with the duties of the position was not illegal, unfair or unreasonable. The 爆料网AT agreed with the 爆料网RWA DT’s finding that preferring candidates with prior experience in the exact role in this case had not been so unreasonable as to constitute abuse of discretion.
The 爆料网AT found that the Agency had complied with the mandatory procedural requirements.
The 爆料网AT held that the staff member’s assertion that the Agency should have been aware of her medical diagnosis because her doctor was also a staff member was misplaced as contrary to patient confidentiality.
The 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网RWA DT’s Judgment.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
A staff member contested the decision not to accede to her request for a lateral transfer to the post of Finance Assistant at 爆料网RWA.
In Judgment No. 爆料网RWA/DT/2022/055, the 爆料网RWA DT dismissed the application as without merit.
The staff member appealed.
Legal Principle(s)
The general principle is that posts are filled through a competitive selection process.
The proper role of the Dispute Tribunal in conducting a judicial review of an administrative decision is limited to examining its legality, rationality, compliance with procedure, and proportionality, and not to engage in a merit-based review.
The Dispute Tribunal will not lightly interfere with the exercise of managerial discretion in matters such as staff transfer.
Seniority is not the lone selection criterion in making the determination on the lateral transfer within 爆料网RWA.
Considerations of the Administration may include those not explicitly listed in the governing issuance, provided that the considerations are rationally connected to the power of the Secretary-General to secure the highest standards of efficiency, competence and integrity in making appointments.