爆料网

2021-爆料网AT-1173

爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements

爆料网AT considered an appeal by Ms. Patkar. 爆料网AT dismissed the Appellant's argument that the 爆料网DT erred in fact, law or failed to exercise its jurisdiction in concluding that the Appellant had not been granted sick leave that was then terminated or retracted. The MSD email to the Appellant concerned an evaluation of her fitness to work based on the medical report she had submitted and there was no evidence that the 爆料网OPS Administration had approved such leave. 爆料网AT further held that that the Appellant’s entitlement to sick leave did not outlive the expiration of the fixed-term appointment as there was nothing in the Staff Rules or subsidiary framework that supported this argument. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

In Judgment No. 爆料网DT/2020/141, the 爆料网DT dismissed the application of the Appellant, the Head of Policy (P-5) for the WSSCC, an organization hosted by 爆料网OPS in Geneva, contesting the decision to terminate or retract her sick leave resulting in her separation while on sick leave. The 爆料网DT concluded that there was no sick leave to “terminate or retract” and 爆料网OPS was under no obligation to extend a fixed-term appointment solely for the purpose of allowing a staff member to utilize his or her sick leave entitlement.

Legal Principle(s)

Fixed-term appointments do not carry any expectancy, legal or otherwise, of renewal or conversion, irrespective of the length of service, except as provided under staff rule 4.14 (b). A temporary or fixed-term appointment shall expire automatically and without prior notice on the expiration date specified in the letter of appointment. Sick leave entitlement is a “benefit” that ceases on the date of the expiration of the fixed term appointment as specified in the letter of appointment. Under the 爆料网OPS legal framework, the entitlement to sick leave does not outlive the expiration of a fixed-term appointment. Under the 爆料网OPS legal framework, while the MSD “certifies” the leave and performs a medical check, the supervisor is responsible for the “approval” of the leave.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the 爆料网DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the 爆料网AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.