2021-��AT-1157

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

The evidence and submissions on record are insufficient to determine the material issue as to whether the Appellant��s claim for compensation totaled less than, or in excess of, USD 25,000, in order to determine the authority of the Secretary of the ABCC to take the contested administrative decision. Hence the remand to ��DT to determine whether the Secretary of the ABCC had the valid power to take the contested decision.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

��DT/2020/167, in which ��DT rejected the Appellant��s application against the decision to deny his Appendix D claim.

Legal Principle(s)

A request for management evaluation of a breach of duty claim does not substitute his/her obligation to make the original claim of gross negligence separately to the Secretary-General for his consideration and decision. ST/AI/234/Rev.1 requires consultation of the ABCC before the Controller, or the Secretary of the ABCC, upon the delegated authority, takes a decision to grant compensation for death, injury or illness up to USD 25, 000. But in the present case, there was a wrongful failure by the Secretary of the ABCC to consult the ABCC. His decision was therefore ultra vires.

Outcome

Appeal granted in part; Case remanded

Outcome Extra Text

Appeal allowed in part; ��DT Judgment set aside, except for its findings on the receivability of the Appellant��s claim of gross negligence or breach of duty of care; case remanded to ��DT for a hearing de novo before a different judge; Appellant��s name be redacted from judgment and any public pronouncement of the decision.

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Appellant

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement