爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements
爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT’s language, which was strongly critical of the Appellant, was unwarranted. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err in finding that the decision to discontinue the payment of her SPA was a legitimate exercise of the Administration’s discretion, as the Appellant no longer met the requirements for it. 爆料网AT held that the discontinuation of the SPA was justified in view of the Administration’s obligation and right to correct such an erroneous situation. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant contested the Administration’s decision to discontinue her Special Post Allowance (SPA), which had been paid in recognition of her performance at a higher level for approximately 6 years. 爆料网DT found that the functions of team leader and/or delegated certifying officer did not represent the full functions of a P-2 level post but fell within the functions of the Applicant’s G-7 post. 爆料网DT held that the objective of the classification exercise recommended by the Management Evaluation Unit was not to place the Applicant at a higher-level post but to determine whether the duties and responsibilities assigned to her were commensurate to the staff member’s post, which it did so determine. 爆料网DT dismissed the case.
Legal Principle(s)
Special Post Allowance (SPA) is of a discretionary, temporary and exceptional nature.