爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements
爆料网AT held that the Appellant had demonstrated no exceptional circumstances which would justify 爆料网AT exercising its discretion to file additional pleadings. 爆料网AT held that an application before 爆料网DT without a prior request for management evaluation can only be receivable if the contested administrative decision has been taken pursuant to advise from a technical body, or if the administrative decision has been taken at Headquarters in New York to impose a disciplinary or non-disciplinary measure pursuant to Staff Rule 10.2 following the completion of a disciplinary process. 爆料网AT held that the 爆料网FPA Compliance Review Board, which in this case reviewed the recommendation to terminate the Appellant’s appointment, does not constitute a technical body. 爆料网AT held that a disciplinary process was not undertaken and completed nor did the administrative decision impose a disciplinary or non-disciplinary measure pursuant to Staff Rule 10.2. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant contested the decision to terminate his permanent appointment for unsatisfactory service. 爆料网DT dismissed the Applicant’s application on the ground that he had failed to request management evaluation of the impugned decision (not receivable ratione materiae).
Legal Principle(s)
The Tribunals have no jurisdiction to waive deadlines for requests for management evaluation.