2018-惇蹋厙AT-871

惇蹋厙AT Held or 惇蹋厙DT Pronouncements

惇蹋厙AT rejected the request for an oral hearing. 惇蹋厙AT held that there was no merit in the Appellant＊s claim that he should be considered a 惇蹋厙 staff member because he worked with 惇蹋厙OPS for over three years. 惇蹋厙AT concluded that 惇蹋厙DT correctly decided that the application was not receivable ratione personae. 惇蹋厙AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 惇蹋厙DT judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the incorrect labelling of his duties during an investigation conducted by the 惇蹋厙OPS Internal Audit and Investigation Group (IAIG) in Morocco. 惇蹋厙DT rendered its judgment striking the application out as non-receivable ratione personae since the Applicant was a contractor.

Legal Principle(s)

Applications presented by contractors are not receivable ratione personae.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the 惇蹋厙DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the 惇蹋厙AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Reda

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement