爆料网

2018-爆料网AT-828

爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements

爆料网AT considered an application for execution filed by Mr Kallon, seeking the execution of the non-pecuniary aspects of the 爆料网AT judgment. 爆料网AT held that there was no need to order execution as the judgment had been executed in full since the order of rescission did not require execution by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that the rescission of the contested administrative decisions took effect as the direct consequence of the judgment. 爆料网AT held that there was no merit in Mr Kallon’s request for execution and, therefore, dismissed his request for costs against the Secretary-General for abuse of process. 爆料网AT dismissed the application for execution of judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

Previous 爆料网AT judgment: The Applicant contested the decisions: 1) not to support his designation as Chief Procurement Officer (CPO) of the 爆料网 Interim Security Force for Abyei; 2) to withdraw his designation as CPO /of the 爆料网 Stabilization Mission in Haiti. 爆料网DT issued a judgment on liability finding that the contested decisions were flawed and that the Applicant was entitled to compensation. Later, 爆料网DT issued a judgment on relief in which it ordered the rescission of the contested decisions, removal of the decisions and related specific documents from the Applicant’s Official Status File (OSF), and placement of its judgment therein. In a separate judgment, 爆料网DT awarded compensation for non-pecuniary damages in the amount of USD 50,000, with interest. The Secretary-General appealed against both judgments on liability and relief. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeals and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgments.

Legal Principle(s)

Left deliberately blank.

Outcome

Revision, correction, interpretation or execution

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the 爆料网DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the 爆料网AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Kallon
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry
Date of Judgement
President Judge
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type