爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements
爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err on a question of law or fact and had identified the relevant administrative decision to trigger the time limits for a request for management evaluation. 爆料网AT held there was no legal difference between an assignment and a reassignment. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s argument that two different administrative decisions were notified to her was without merit. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s argument that a communication of entitlements and benefits cannot constitute a notification of the underlying administrative decision concerning status was without merit. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant contested the decision not to pay her a number of benefits and entitlements following her reassignment to Uganda due to an outbreak of Ebola in Liberia. 爆料网DT rejected her application as not receivable because she had failed to contest the terms of her reassignment by requesting management evaluation within sixty days.
Legal Principle(s)
Left deliberately blank
Outcome
Outcome Extra Text
Th