爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements
爆料网AT considered the appeal by the Secretary-General challenging the amount of the award of compensation for moral damages. 爆料网AT held that the award of moral damages was supported by the evidence before 爆料网DT and that the amount was not excessive based on that evidence. 爆料网AT rejected the Secretary-General’s argument that the award in the present case should be compared with awards in similar non-renewal cases. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT had not committed any error in its assessment of the award of moral damages and that the Secretary-General had not established any ground which would justify 爆料网AT’s interference. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
The Applicant contested the decision not to renew her contract beyond December 31, 2013, on the grounds of unsatisfactory service, although her Standard Assignment Length (SAL) had been extended until December 31, 2014. 爆料网DT found that the decision not to renew the Applicant’s appointment based on performance-related reasons was unlawful because the Administration had not followed the 爆料网HCR’s policies on performance management. 爆料网DT held that the extension of the SAL had given the Applicant a legitimate expectation that her one-year fixed-term appointment would be renewed until 31 December 2014. 爆料网DT ordered the rescission of the non-renewal decision and, as an alternative to the rescission, the payment of compensation in lieu. 爆料网DT additionally awarded the Applicant six months’ net base salary compensation for moral damage for the medical harm caused to her as a result of the decision not to renew her contract.
Legal Principle(s)
The criterion for an award of moral damages is the degree of injury suffered by the individual staff member as a result of the unlawful decision. That the type of unlawful decision is the same as in several other cases does not establish that the degree of moral damage must be similar in each case. The assessment of an award of moral damages is made on a case-by-case basis according to the discretion of the Tribunal.