爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements
The Appellant appealed the 爆料网RWA DT judgment failure to consider several points and to address compensation. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant did not identify any of the requisite grounds in his appeal. 爆料网AT held that it would not allow new claims to be raised on appeal when the circumstances giving rise to such claims were known to a party at the time and should have been presented to 爆料网RWA DT. 爆料网AT upheld the 爆料网RWA DT’s decision not to award compensation on the basis that there was no evidence in support of the Appellant’s claim of psychological suffering. 爆料网AT held that the Appellant’s case was fully and fairly considered by 爆料网RWA DT. 爆料网AT held that there was no error of law or fact in 爆料网RWA DT’s decision. 爆料网AT held there was no merit in the appeal. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网RWA DT judgment.
Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed
爆料网RWA DT judgment: The Applicant contested his letter of censure and suspension for one week without pay for misconduct in the form of instigating a student to make a false complaint about another teacher. 爆料网DT found for the Applicant, ordering the withdrawal of the letter of censure and reimbursement of the one week’s salary.
Legal Principle(s)
The need for compensation must be demonstrated by the evidence. Moral damages may not be awarded without specific evidence supporting the claim.