爆料网

2015-爆料网AT-496

爆料网AT Held or 爆料网DT Pronouncements

爆料网AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT erred in law in finding that, pursuant to the Instruction Manual, a candidate for an advertised post was entitled to be apprised of the composition of the interview panel prior to the interview. 爆料网AT held, however, that by pointing out that she had been previously interviewed for the post and that there were ongoing proceedings before 爆料网DT regarding her challenge to a prior selection exercise, the staff member had put the Administration on notice of the importance she attached to the panel’s composition. 爆料网AT held that 爆料网DT did not err in concluding that had the staff member been informed of the composition of the panel, she would have requested the replacement of the panel members and the Administration’s failures regarding the notice of the composition of the panel vitiated the entire process. 爆料网AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the 爆料网DT judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested her non-selection, in particular the Administration’s failure to notify her of the composition of the interview panel, and the non-selection decision. 爆料网DT held that, in failing to notify the Applicant of the composition of the interview panel, she was deprived of a fundamental right, namely the possibility to contest the composition of the interview panel. 爆料网DT rescinded the non-selection decision and awarded the staff member USD 8,000 as material damages for lack of full and fair consideration and USD 6,000 as moral damages for the distress she suffered due to the irregularities.

Legal Principle(s)

Rules, policies, or procedures intended for general application may only be established by duly promulgated Secretary-General’s bulletins and administrative issuances. The “Instruction Manual for the Hiring Manager on the Staff Selection System” (Instruction Manual), at most, provides guidance on the responsibilities of the hiring manager and does not have the legal force. A candidate is not entitled by virtue of the Instruction Manual to be apprised of the composition of the interview panel prior to the interview.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the 爆料网DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the 爆料网AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Asariotis
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry
Date of Judgement
President Judge
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type