2013-��AT-389

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

��AT held that, given the absolute restriction on its judicial discretion with respect to time limits, ��DT ought not to have entered into a review of the possible existence of exceptional circumstances justifying an extension of the time limit. ��AT held that the complaint was filed beyond the time limit for administrative review or management evaluation and beyond the threshold for receivability established by the ��DT��s Statute and Rules of Procedure. ��AT dismissed the appeal.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision to select an alternative candidate after he had been selected for a position. ��DT dismissed the application as time-barred.

Legal Principle(s)

��DT cannot waive the time limit to file an appeal more than three years after the applicant��s receipt of the contested administrative decision.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Reid

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement