2013-��AT-295

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

��AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General. ��AT held that ��DT was correct to find that there was no breach of Mr Powell��s due process rights at the preliminary investigation stage. ��AT held that ��DT manifestly erred in fact and in law by finding that the investigations conducted by the Board of Inquiry (BOI) and the Sexual Exploitation and Abuse (SEA) Team were final investigations and by then attaching due process rights that were pertinent only after the initiation of disciplinary proceedings. ��AT allowed the appeal, set aside the ��DT findings in paragraphs 86 and 106 of the ��DT judgment that the investigations conducted by the BOI and SEA Investigation Team constituted final investigations attaching the due process rights enumerated by ��DT, and set aside the ��DT award of compensation in paragraph 131 of the ��DT judgment of one year��s net base salary for breaches of Mr Powell��s due process rights.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision to demote him by one level with no possibility of promotion for two years for misconduct. ��DT found for the Applicant and awarded compensation.

Legal Principle(s)

During the preliminary investigation stage, only limited due process rights apply.

Outcome

Appeal granted in part

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Powell

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement