2012-��AT-241

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

��AT held that ��DT had correctly found that the application was not receivable. ��AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the ��DT judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision of the Ethics Office that considered that the events he had reported did not demonstrate any professional misconduct for the purposes of ST/SGB/2005/21. ��DT found that the application was not receivable ratione temporis since the Applicant had failed to submit his request for administrative review within the two-month time limit.

Legal Principle(s)

Left deliberately blank

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Muratore

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement