2012-��AT-202

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

��AT held that ��DT was correct in finding that the statement dated 26 November 2003 was neither a decision to terminate the Appellant��s appointment nor a disciplinary measure. ��AT held that the statement was merely a publicly stated opinion which had no legal consequences on the Appellant who, in addition to having already been informed on 29 October 2003 that his contract would not be renewed beyond 30 November 2003, had also declared that he would not be able or willing to continue working for ��ODC after his contract expired. ��AT accordingly dismissed the appeal and affirmed the ��DT judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant requested administrative review and a suspension of action regarding the Executive Director��s statement from 26 November 2003, which stated that the Applicant would not have a future with the Organisation. ��DT found that, given that the Applicant had already been informed on 29 October 2003 of the decision not to renew his appointment, the ensuing 26 November 2003 statement by the Executive Director in the ��ODC press release could not be considered to be either a decision not to renew his appointment, or a disciplinary measure.

Legal Principle(s)

A statement with no legal consequences to a staff member will not be regarded as a disciplinary measure.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Buscaglia

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement