2012-��AT-200

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

��AT held that there was no valid claim of unfair treatment and discrimination by the Appellant against the former Chief of ATS and ��DT therefore correctly limited its consideration to the interview process. ��AT held that the Appellant was merely repeating arguments that were adequately considered by ��DT and that there were no reasons to reverse ��DT��s judgment. ��AT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the ��DT judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision to not select him for the post of Chief of the Arabic Translation Service (ATS). ��DT found that there was no material irregularity in that all relevant procedures and guidelines were followed. ��DT dismissed the application.

Legal Principle(s)

In reviewing administrative decisions regarding appointments and promotions, ��DT has to examine: (1) whether the procedure as laid down in the Staff Regulations and Rules was followed; and (2) whether the staff member was given fair and adequate consideration.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Majbri

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement