2011-��AT-187

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

��AT held that the reassignment decision did not breach any rule, noting that, under Staff Regulation 1. 2(c), staff members are subject to the authority of the Secretary-General and to assignment by him or her to any of the activities or offices of the ��. ��AT held that the contested decision did not contravene ST/AI/2006/3/Rev. 1, ST/SGB/172 or ST/SGB/274. ��AT held there was no error in the ��DT��s decision to reject the Appellant��s argument that the Organisation failed to act in good faith in its dealings with him. ��AT affirmed the ��DT judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested a lateral transfer. ��DT dismissed the application.

Legal Principle(s)

Left deliberately blank.

Outcome

Appeal dismissed on merits

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Allen

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement