2011-��AT-183

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

��AT considered an appeal by the Secretary-General limited to the quantum of compensation awarded. ��AT held that the termination indemnity paid to Mr Bowen should be deducted from the compensation awarded to him as an alternative to rescission. ��AT held that the compensation awarded by ��DT was excessive, noting that the decision only affected the three remaining months of his one-year term and that termination indemnity was paid. ��AT held that Mr Bowen had not produced evidence of exceptional circumstances that would justify the award of compensation equivalent to the maximum statutory limit of two years�� net base salary. ��AT held that it was adequate to reduce the compensation to six months�� net base salary. ��AT held that the appeal was not an abuse of process by the Secretary-General and rejected Mr Bowen��s request for costs. ��AT allowed the appeal in part. ��AT deducted the termination indemnity paid, in addition to the payment effectuated in lieu of notice, from the compensation awarded to the Appellant as an alternative to reinstatement; and reduced the compensation awarded for the effects of the early termination from two years to six months�� net base salary.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

Mr. Bowen contested the decision to terminate his appointment on grounds of performance. ��DT found, in part, in favour of the Applicant, ordering rescission of the decision (or compensation in lieu) and compensation.

Legal Principle(s)

Left deliberately blank

Outcome

Appeal granted in part

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Bowen

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement