2011-��AT-161

��AT Held or ��DT Pronouncements

��AT considered an application for interpretation of judgment No. 2010-��AT-076 by Mr Kasyanov in which he requested clarification as to whether the compensation awarded by ��AT was to be determined as of the date the breach occurred or as of the date the judgment was issued. ��AT accepted the application and held that the compensation was to be calculated as of the date of the ��AT judgment.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

Previous ��AT judgment: Subsequent to a successful challenge before ��DT of his non-selection for a post, in judgment No. 2010-��AT-076 Mr Kasyanov was awarded compensation of two months�� net base salary.

Legal Principle(s)

Left deliberately blank.

Outcome

Appeal granted in part

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the ��DT Statute and Article 11(3) of the ��AT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants

Kasyanov

Entity

Case Number(s)

Tribunal

Registry

Date of Judgement